Human decision boundary
The current workflow makes human review required, identifies a final decision owner, keeps automated rejection disabled, and records the decision-governance context for the role.
Buyer trust package
Review the controls behind the hiring decision—not just the software around it.
The current trust package combines application-security evidence with the new decision-integrity controls: stable role criteria, evidence provenance, verification signals, human decision ownership, and an exportable governance record.
Buyer-first evaluationClear product. Clear evidence. Clear responsibility.
Built for serious conversations across Talent Acquisition, HR Operations, hiring managers, Legal, Privacy, Security, Procurement, and AI Governance.
Current evidence
Product controls a buyer can inspect in a qualified review.
These are product and source-supported capabilities, not certifications or unconditional promises for every customer environment.
Role-criteria governance
Role Brief Lock preserves the agreed criteria and records controlled changes so later requirements do not silently rewrite the basis of comparison.
Evidence provenance
Candidate evidence can be distinguished as claimed, observed, corroborated, or needing classification, with the source context visible beside the evidence.
Verification without a fraud score
Candidate Integrity records identity, consistency, credential, continuity, and anomaly-review states separately from candidate suitability and ranking.
Decision Integrity Record
The product can export the role brief, provenance summary, Candidate Integrity review state, human-governance configuration, and decision-integrity history.
Existing application controls
Authenticated workspace access, CSRF protection, secure token handling, fail-closed upload scanning, encrypted-document handling, signed payment webhooks, health checks, and hardened runtime controls remain part of the controlled pilot architecture.
Open diligence
What product controls do not settle on their own.
Decision integrity creates better evidence for review. It does not remove the need for independent assurance, customer-environment verification, or legal and regulatory diligence.
Independent assurance
No SOC 2, ISO certification, independent penetration-test assurance, or bias-audit certification is claimed.
Customer deployment
Identity, hosting, monitoring, network controls, backup restoration, data location, secrets, and exact environment configuration must be verified for the customer deployment.
Legal, privacy, and candidate rights
Lawful basis, notices, retention, accommodations, human-review rights, candidate challenges, subprocessors, contracting, and jurisdiction-specific obligations require customer-specific review.
Fairness and AI governance
The decision-integrity workflow improves traceability and human accountability, but buyer-specific validation, adverse-impact assessment, policy review, and ongoing monitoring remain necessary.
Decision Integrity Record
A portable record of how the decision was governed.
The current product can package the locked role brief, evidence-provenance summary, candidate-integrity review state, human-governance settings, and decision-integrity history for buyer-approved review or export.
What this helps answer
- What were we actually hiring for?
- Where did the evidence come from?
- What verification questions remained?
- Who reviewed the recommendation?
- Who owned the final employment decision?
- What changed during the process?
Next step
Bring the decision record into the trust conversation.
A qualified review can walk Security, Privacy, Legal, Procurement, Talent Acquisition, and AI Governance through both the application controls and the human decision boundaries.