Decision Integrity
VettifyIQ connects role alignment, evidence provenance, verification signals, human review, and the final decision record so teams can understand not only who advanced, but what the decision was based on and who remained accountable.
Built for serious conversations across Talent Acquisition, HR Operations, hiring managers, Legal, Privacy, Security, Procurement, and AI Governance.
The product thesis
A defensible hiring process needs a stable role brief, distinguishable evidence, visible uncertainty, verification without accusation, accountable human judgment, and a record that survives the handoff.
Five decision-integrity controls
The current product keeps these controls inside the existing workflow rather than adding another layer of administrative navigation.
Agree what matters before candidate review begins, then make later changes visible instead of letting hidden requirements drift into the process.
Separate where candidate evidence came from so a resume claim is not treated the same as something the team observed or independently corroborated.
Record verification questions separately from candidate suitability. Integrity indicators support review; they do not become a hiring score.
Make the decision boundary explicit for every role: what assistance is used, who reviews it, and who owns the employment decision.
Export the governance context behind a hiring decision instead of relying on disconnected notes or a final score with no history.
Important boundaries
The product is intentionally designed to support human review without creating a fraud score, universal candidate score, or autonomous rejection engine.
Candidate Integrity does not change the candidate's fit recommendation, rank, or disposition. Verification questions are resolved by people.
Authorized reviewers interpret evidence, resolve uncertainty, recommend next steps, and retain responsibility for employment decisions.
The workflow can produce useful governance evidence, but it is not legal advice, regulatory certification, bias-audit assurance, or a substitute for buyer-specific review.
The public product story reflects the current controlled-pilot experience. Customer data, notices, retention, legal basis, accessibility, fairness testing, deployment, and jurisdiction-specific obligations are confirmed before broader use.
Next step
A focused demonstration can walk from Role Brief Lock through Candidate Evidence, Comparison, Manager Review, Decision Record, and the downloadable Decision Integrity Record using fictional data.
